On 25/01/05 13:54, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> I think you should re-examine the problem and find a solution not
> involving an outragously sized bitmap... ;) Think further - even if that
> bitmap compressed very well and could be stored in 10MB disk space, each
> time you access it you'd have to decompress it into memory. And unless
> you can access it, there's little point in having it.

True.

> Given you're at NIWA, do you have access to matlab and can check whether
> your files can be read as binary data in a sparse matrix? Octave is a
> 2*free replacement for matlab but it's not as advanced.

There are a few matlab licenses floating around; I'll check it out.

> Can you break down the problem into chunks of say 10000x10000 pixels
> max?

That's pretty straightforward. Not as butch as one great big problem though ;)

Cheers,
Roy.

-- 
Roy Britten, Lead Software Developer, Information Systems Team
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research
P.O. Box 8602, Christchurch, New Zealand
P:+64-3-343-7818 F:+64-3-348-5548

Reply via email to