Hi Barry, this must have been the email clients mucking around with the format - all lines in fstab do in fact have utf8 rather than utf[space]8.

The strange thing is that all the ntfs partition lines in fstab are identical apart from the number following hda or hdb and the directory in which it should be mounted. There are also hda7 and hda8 which can also not be mounted - providing the same error. Does that and the following output help?

SuSEbox:/home/roger # fdisk -l

Disk /dev/hda: 160.0 GB, 160041885696 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19457 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

  Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hda1   *           1        3570    28675993+   7  HPFS/NTFS
/dev/hda2            3571       19457   127612327+   f  W95 Ext'd (LBA)
/dev/hda5            3571        7394    30716248+   b  W95 FAT32
/dev/hda6            7395       11473    32764536    b  W95 FAT32
/dev/hda7           11474       15552    32764536    b  W95 FAT32
/dev/hda8           15553       19457    31366881    b  W95 FAT32

Disk /dev/hdb: 40.0 GB, 40020664320 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 4865 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

  Device Boot      Start         End      Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hdb1   *           1        2932    23551258+   7  HPFS/NTFS
/dev/hdb2            2933        4865    15526822+   5  Extended
/dev/hdb5            2933        3696     6136798+  83  Linux
/dev/hdb6            3697        3759      506016   82  Linux swap
/dev/hdb7            3760        4865     8883913+  83  Linux

Cheers,
(a clutching at straws) Roger


Barry wrote:



Roger Searle wrote:
snip

/dev/hdb1 /windows/D ntfs ro,users,gid=users,umask=0002,nls=utf8 0 0
/dev/hda5 /windows/E vfat users,gid=users,umask=0002,iocharset=utf 8 0 0

^

/dev/hda6 /windows/F ntfs ro,users,gid=users,umask=0002,nls=utf8 0 0


Is the problem caused by having 'utf 8' instead of 'utf8' in your /etc/fstab?

HTH

Barry



Reply via email to