On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 12:13 +1200, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> > I've had to use {x=(y==0):1:0;} instead. I've seen worse.
Or even {x=(y==0)?1:0;}. Oops.
> Yep. Isn't this gcc?
It's a different project aimed at specifically micros. See
http://sdcc.sf.net
> > Yup. I adopt a simpler solution - order more capable PIC samples :)
>
> Always a realistic option. At least it's only PIC assembler, and not
> Intel x86, which is rather more, uhhhm, let's say, convoluted.
I can handle either in assembly code - whether I want to or if it's a
good idea is debatable :)
Vik :v)
--
Vik Olliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Olliver Family
