On Thu, 19 May 2005 11:17:29 +1200 Christopher Sawtell wrote: > On Wed, 18 May 2005 17:22, John Carter wrote: > > On Wed, 18 May 2005, Michael JasonSmith wrote: > > > On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 16:44 +1200, Zane Gilmore wrote: > > >> John Carter wrote: > > >> <snip> > > >> > > >>> Simple enough? > > >> > > >> I would argue that that is too simple. > > > > > > Agreed. Below is the C code to do the task, and that is trivial. > > > > Ah yes, now convert that into doing a freq distribution of words and then > > C struggles whereas my ruby probably wouldn't grow much. > > > > The other thing I would like to show offm preferably if there is a 'net > > connection is simple client/server stuff perhaps with a touch of XML > > thrown in for good measure. > There is a net connection, that's the whole point of this particular venue.
yes but the thing we put in the wall doesn't work for some reason, is there someone who can go and sort it out? It probably requires a couple of laptops (for testing), a couple of network cables and the possibility of re-squishing the wires into the back of the sockets. > > In this particular case would you like to have another machine locally to act > as the other end of the network? If so let me know what you need other than a > standard Ruby interpreter. > > -- > C. S. > -- Nick Rout Barrister & Solicitor Christchurch <http://www.rout.co.nz> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
