Christopher Sawtell wrote:
>>I didn't take the reference to bafflegab as being pointed at you Chris !
> 
> Oh, I think it was, but, knowing the author, I realise that it was good 
> natured humourous ribbing. I can take that with no problems whatsoever.

:-)

Actually, it was aimed at multiple people on the thread, but your post
seemed a good place to interject it!

There seems to be a lot of excess verbiage on some threads of the list
at the moment, and a lot of it is meta-discussion, trying to get the
last word in, or to "clarify" the actual meaning of something said
earlier. I don't think it helps us very much.

The best defence against all this is "knowing the author". Thanks Chris!

> ..."by governmental bodies."

Contribution to CLUG-C might make you a governmental body? :-)

-jim (it feels like a Friday, somehow)

Reply via email to