Carl Cerecke wrote: > Besides, the IMAP proxy > idea sounds kind of fun in a geeky way.
I guess just stunnel4 on it's own would be able to do that, as it's supposed to provide ssl support to a service that doesn't have it ... and IIRC that service doesn't have to be on the same machine as stunnel! An actual imap proxy (http://www.imapproxy.org/) does things like cache connections to make things more efficient ... and it recommended in between a webmail package and an imap server anyway, altough I haven't tried it. You'd still have to provide the SSL features with stunnel, but that should be OK. -jim
