There exists a kernel httpd module. Your webserver becomes part of the kernel. This is, for various reasons, a bad idea. But if speed (or benchmarketing) is your main aim, that's the way to go.
On 16/11/05, Christopher Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:58, Rik Tindall wrote: > > "Long live Lighttpd!" > > http://www.projectx.co.nz/articles/2005/09/27/ApacheIsDead > > (As referenced via zoomin from RNZ's 'Digital Life' today.) > > What do our experts think? > > Apache is not "dead" simply because it is not the fastest httpd. > We all know that. The whole point about Apache is that it is well written and > secure code which is readily understandable by anybody who has relatively > competent C skills. The documentation is exemplary and the ability to install > modules for built in language interpreters etc. is a beautiful layer of icing > of the cake. To abandon all that is just stupid imho. > > I have been using the extremely fast Boa httpd, but now have a need for the > modules in another project so will be using Apache again for a bit now. > > -- > CS >
