Volkers answer to the part of Nicks question about output from this code not being required to be licenced under the GPL. seems correct.
Go to; http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLOutput Cheers Ross Drummond On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 21:24, Volker Kuhlmann wrote: > It seems to me that people fail to distinguish between a public > performance of the output of some software (colourful lights at the > intersection) and the software itself. That's the point of the software > - produce output. There's no link between the rights to the software and > the rights to its output, although some authors try hard to establish > one. Their prerogative. As soon as you blur that distinction with > something like gimp, it'll be deader than a dodo. >
