On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 12:58:41 +1300 Volker Kuhlmann wrote: > > There are also some booting issues if you want to use reiserfs. > > Ehh, which? Some people who don't like reiser like to repeat this, that > doesn't make it correct though. IIRC I've booted from reiser for as long > as I've used reiser (kernel 2.2), no separate /boot either[1]. And for > all of this time reiser was compiled as module: no booting issues. > > There's no need any more to bother with /boot. My '99 mobo doesn't need > it.
I recall their were problems with grub and reiser at one point - one version of grub didn't properly support a version of reiser and booting would be borked. I don't believe I have seen a reference to this problem for 2 years or more. In other words it has been fixed. Well i have made a small /boot (only 32M) and I am stuck with it short of a complete re-partition so I'm not going to debate it. Frankly it is a pain because you have to remember to mount it if you want to install a new kernel or change grub.conf. -- Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
