> The first release of JFS on Linux was just on six years ago, and considered > 'production ready' about a year later. Personally, I would not call that a > "completely new port".
I didn't say JFS was bad, only that your argumentation why it was reliable was flawed. The argument "JFS had a lot of testing now on Linux" is good. Any advantages jfs might have over reiser or ext3? > All that said, note that I have been running Reiser4 on my lappie, and am > very satisfied with it and don't intend to change. This isn't about "which is better/bigger/whatnot", but characteristics and situations in which one might want to deploy one over the other. Volker -- Volker Kuhlmann is possibly list0570 with the domain in header http://volker.dnsalias.net/ Please do not CC list postings to me.
