'bout time you got your own domain then (: Freedom!
On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 21:52:53 +1300 Roger Searle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > they are brightmail clients too. > > i'd join the list of people on the verge of moving, were it not so > inconvenient to change email address . . . > > roger > > > > Steve Holdoway wrote: > > >...can I recommend ihug? Orcon's been getting a load of bad press lately, > >and I wouldn't recommend telstra to anybody - I'm still fighting for a link > >capable of supporting ssh after 9 months since we moved offices. I think > >you'll second that one now (: > > > >Mind you, this'll be the kiss of death to ihug now. They're all run by > >accountants and pimply kids as far as I can see. > > > >Steve > >PS. It's not the upper case domain name is it. Maybe they've implemented a > >spam guard that's case sensitive. That's be a laugh, wouldn't it! ( I know > >clear use brightmail, but know nothing about paradise ). > > > >On Thu, 09 Feb 2006 21:25:47 +1300 > >Wesley Parish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > >>What the H*** is going on at paradise.net? > >> > >>This is interference with my mail. I want an apology at the very least. > >> > >>Has anybody else had such offensively trite and stupid responses to such > >>serious problems? Frankly, with such a track record, paradise.net doesn't > >>have much of a future. > >> > >>Wesley Parish > >> > >>---------- Forwarded Message ---------- > >> > >>Subject: Fwd: Your removal from the LINUX-390 list [Incident:060208-001708] > >>Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 19:40 > >>From: TelstraClear Helpdesk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >>Response > >>--------------------------------------------------------------- > >>Your question has been received. Below is up to 5 Items that the System has > >> identified as containing keywords from your question, please check these > >> for > >> possible answers to your question. If they Do Not solve your question > >> please > >> reply in the space between the lines below. > >> > >>[===> Please enter your reply below this line <===] > >> > >>[===> Please enter your reply above this line <===] > >> > >>Please try the following > >> > >>Title: How can I reduce the amount of spam I receive? > >>Link: > >> https://paradise.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/paradise.cfg/php/enduser/popup_adp.php > >>?p_faqid=1060&p_created=1124678680 > >> > >>Title: Spam slipping through the filter > >>Link: > >> https://paradise.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/paradise.cfg/php/enduser/popup_adp.php > >>?p_faqid=575&p_created=1076207850 > >> > >>Title: Downloading same emails over and over > >>Link: > >> https://paradise.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/paradise.cfg/php/enduser/popup_adp.php > >>?p_faqid=562&p_created=1076204174 > >> > >>Title: Paradise Webmail > >>Link: > >> https://paradise.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/paradise.cfg/php/enduser/popup_adp.php > >>?p_faqid=589&p_created=1076212380 > >> > >>Title: Large message jamming mail download > >>Link: > >> https://paradise.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/paradise.cfg/php/enduser/popup_adp.php > >>?p_faqid=536&p_created=1075872358 > >> > >> > >>As the system is still learning, some answers may be non-related, we are > >> updating the rules for this daily. You can also search for answers from our > >> knowledge base online: > >> > >>Clear.Net http://clearnet.custhelp.com > >>Paradise http://paradise.custhelp.com > >>TelstraClear https://telstraclear.custhelp.com > >> > >>Discussion Thread > >>--------------------------------------------------------------- > >>Customer (Wesley Parish) - 08/02/2006 07.40 PM > >>Hi. I got this today. Could you take a look to see if everything's okay > >> with my email account? I suspect the worst. > >> > >>Wesley Parish > >> > >>---------- Forwarded Message ---------- > >> > >>Subject: Your removal from the LINUX-390 list > >>Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 18:00 > >>From: "MARIST LISTSERV Server (14.4)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>To: Wesley Parish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >>Wed, 8 Feb 2006 00:00:21 > >> > >>You have been automatically removed from the LINUX-390 list (Linux on 390 > >>Port) as a result of repeated delivery error reports from your mail > >>system. This decision was based on the automatic error monitoring policy > >>in effect for the list, and has not been reviewed or otherwise confirmed > >>by a human being. If you receive this message, it means that something is > >>wrong: while you are obviously able to receive mail, your mail system has > >>been regularly reporting that your account did not exist, or that you > >>were otherwise permanently unable to receive mail. Here is some > >>information which may assist you or your local help desk in determining > >>the cause of the problem: > >> > >>- The failing address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >>- The first error was reported on 2006-02-03. > >> > >>- Since then, a total of 2 delivery errors have been received. > >> > >>- The last reported error was: 5.0.0 X-Postfix; host > >>pop3.paradise.net.nz[203.96.152.6] said: 550 > >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown > >>(in reply to RCPT TO command) > >> > >>PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE THIS MESSAGE. While you can of course re-subscribe > >>to the list, it is important for you to report this problem to your mail > >>administrator so that it can be solved. This problem is not specific to > >>the LINUX-390 list, and also affects your private mail. This means that > >>YOU HAVE PROBABLY LOST SOME PRIVATE MAIL AS WELL. Anyone trying to write > >>to you during the same time frame will probably have received the same > >>errors for the same reason. The LINUX-390 list is but one of the many > >>people who may have tried to write to you while your mail system was > >>malfunctioning. > >> > >>DO NOT LET TECHNICAL PEOPLE CONVINCE YOU THAT THIS IS NORMAL. It is never > >>normal for a mail system to claim that a valid, working account does not > >>exist, just as it would not be normal for the post office to return some > >>of your mail with "addressee unknown" when the address was written > >>correctly. It is true that some mail systems are less reliable than > >>others, and your technical people may be doing the best they can with the > >>tools they have. But, ultimately, the level of service that you are > >>receiving is the result of a business decision, and not something due to > >>a universal technical limitation that one can only accept. Reliable mail > >>systems do exist, and it is ultimately up to you to decide whether this > >>level of service is acceptable or not. > >> > >>------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >>-- > >>Clinersterton beademung, with all of love - RIP James Blish > >>----- > >>Mau e ki, he aha te mea nui? > >>You ask, what is the most important thing? > >>Maku e ki, he tangata, he tangata, he tangata. > >>I reply, it is people, it is people, it is people. > >> > >>Question Reference No060208-001708 > >>--------------------------------------------------------------- > >> Date Created: 08/02/2006 07.40 PM > >> Last Updated: 08/02/2006 07.40 PM > >> Status: Solved > >> Paradise User ID: > >> > >>------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >>-- > >>Clinersterton beademung, with all of love - RIP James Blish > >>----- > >>Mau e ki, he aha te mea nui? > >>You ask, what is the most important thing? > >>Maku e ki, he tangata, he tangata, he tangata. > >>I reply, it is people, it is people, it is people. > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > >
