> Suse 10.0 ( isn't 10.1 coming out real soon > now?? ). Yes, got delayed because management decided quality control was more important than meeting the release date, after top management (not SUSE's) decided to turn the package management upside down not much before beta1.
> I did get to the stage where I could boot a home grown 2.6.16 kernel, > but it failed, as my boot partition is using software mirroring, and > mdadm (breezy version)requires devfs, which has been removed from the > kernel I am booting straight from reiser /dev/md0, which is a raid1. SUSE doesn't use devfs. Worked out of the box for the past X years. So it can be done, but using vanilla kernels when you want something stable is dicy. Volker -- Volker Kuhlmann is list0570 with the domain in header http://volker.dnsalias.net/ Please do not CC list postings to me.
