On Wed, 17 May 2006 12:46:49 +1200
Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > > Yes that's all fine, but not the point. The point is, all servers on the
> > > internet are reachable *by the orange*, and that's a bad joke.
> 
> > It works on the idea that there are levels of security, and you need
> >no special rights to access hosts at a lower level of security than
> >yourself. Green >Orange>Red. To the best of my knowledge this is a
> >fundamental concept
> 
> Yes, it is, but it's not the only fundamental concept. Others are: don't
> allow access unless needed, use more than one line of defense.
> 
> SuSEfirewall takes this as a given, and all this routing stuff is
> trivial to configure (no eye candy though). I was expecting as much from
> a dedicated firewall, but ipcop is definitely a step down in where it
> really matters: the iptables rules. I've been thinking cheekily whether
> I can plonk SuSEfirewall on top of ipcop Linux... (SUSE is now
> definitely desktop, no way it runs on 32MB).
> 
> Ok I've made a 3x eth[012] ipcop test box and found something to connect
> to each end. ipcop gui, firewall->firewall options->disable ping
> response: set to no. 

Bug 1: it never accepts pings from internal,server, or outside (just logs and 
dumps).
Wrong.  
PING 192.168.3.5 (192.168.3.5) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.3.5: icmp_seq=1 ttl=127 time=0.502 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.3.5: icmp_seq=2 ttl=127 time=0.455 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.3.5: icmp_seq=3 ttl=127 time=0.439 ms

Bug 2: It never forwards pings from the server to the outside. 
Wrong.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ping www.google.com
PING www.l.google.com (66.102.7.147) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 66.102.7.147: icmp_seq=1 ttl=239 time=169 ms
64 bytes from 66.102.7.147: icmp_seq=2 ttl=239 time=169 ms

But the server can connect to any
> tcp port outside... and the user setup doesn't allow configuration of
> anything but udp or tcp. 
Wrong.
GRE     DEFAULT IP : GRE        =>      192.168.xxx.yyy : GRE    VPN
> All nice-looking GUI, but the rules are put
> together with an astonishing carelessness! Trust *that*??? Very
> disappointing.
> 
> Volker
> 
> -- 
> Volker Kuhlmann                       is list0570 with the domain in header
> http://volker.dnsalias.net/   Please do not CC list postings to me.

Sorry Volker, you're just plain wrong on most of your points. Are you using the 
current version? It's at 1.4.10. And yes, I do trust it. No, I'm not 
disappointed. You're welcome to try and break in any time.

Steve

Reply via email to