Thanks for your presentation and subesequent pdf. I look forward to Part Two.
>From the pdf file, I noticed a comment on digikam that, if I may quote, "Lousy HTML generation (HTML hardcoded, no CSS file, album not extendible)". >From reading that, I have two questions, although they are somewhat open-ended ones. I'm asking onlist as others may also be interested in your comments. The topic is not quite Linux per se but does follow on from your discussion. I have changed the thread title so this topic can either be ignored or, if offtopic, can be taken offlist, as desired. 1. In what way would the HTML be NOT hardcoded? Are you referring to the possibility of using a selection of templates or some other such method of producing unique pages from a single HTML generation programme? 2. Although the answer to this may touch on your answer above, what form/s of extensibility do you regard as desirable in an HTML generator? Just trying to get an idea of what it is that you (and others) would regard as being a "good" HTML gallery generator. Cheers, Brett. -----Original Message----- From: Volker Kuhlmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 13 July 2006 1:55 p.m. To: [email protected] Subject: Photos with Linux presentation slides I've put the slides from Tuesday's presentation here: http://volker.top.geek.nz/linux/presentation/Photo-Linux-part1.pdf Volker Btw Kpdf rocks! So does beamer. -- Volker Kuhlmann is list0570 with the domain in header http://volker.dnsalias.net/ Please do not CC list postings to me.
