Simple answer... don't! RH9 is absolutely ancient, and only used by those pain in the *ss colo's in the us who are just milking old technology for all it's worth. If you want to stay with RH, then either use CentOS ( http://www.centos.org ) or Fedora Core 5 ( http://www.redhat.com/fedora ). Given that you're installing on a system with SATA, there's no need to go back in history.
Using RedHat products will limit your support from the group - I think there's 2 of us who use it - so you may want to look at (K)Ubuntu ( http://kubuntu.org and http://www.ubuntu.com ) as alternatives, as they are the current flavour of the month. I'm always happy to download stuff for those with limited bandwidth, being as I'm a sysadm with unlimited access! Cheers, Steev On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:56:04 +1200 amoafo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry Rob, > > I am using Red Hat 9. > I suspect it is because I am using SATA. I have two HDD of 80G each. I have > already installed w2k. > > Osei > > O&F Amoafo > 65 Harris Crescent > Papanui > Christchurch > phone +6433521586 > fax +6433521587 > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Fisher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, 22 mmmm 2006 6:23 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Any help any ideas? > > On Friday 22 September 2006 2:50 am, amoafo wrote: > > > How should I have installed the two OS? > > > If you tell us which distro you are attempting to install someone with > experience of that distro will offer advice. > > Most distros have relatively easy installers now. > > Rob >
