Hey, If you're interested, bounce your ideas off us! If we can work out a new way of fuzzy matching on these images, then you'll be helping the OSS cause big time. I haven't manipulated images in this way in the best part of 20 years, so I'm a bit rusty!
Cheers, Steve ( & the crew at firetrust.org of course! ) On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 14:58:36 +1300 Rik Tindall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Christopher Sawtell wrote: > > On Wednesday 01 November 2006 21:09, Wesley Parish wrote: > > > >> I do my MANUAL spam-filtering through webmail these days - it helps do > >> several things - above all else, it keeps my sent-mail folder relatively > >> clean of [EMAIL PROTECTED] muck. > >> > Me too now. On dialup it's a time-saving, getting only the good mail down. > > Word is though, of global spam explosion clogging Ihug & Maxnet (etc) > earlier in the week - due to inserted gif ads & random text emulating > real mail successfully (i.e. no more V14GR4 etc.) > > So, when someone hears of a *nix filter tackling this new wave of > garbage, please let us know. Until then, just accept spam-overload as > YABenefitOfCapitalism, and prepare for swearing off email if necessary. > Sad but oh so typical resource wastage. > > FOSS not floss. > > >> Today I did the same as usual, only to find that though the webmail duly > >> marked most of the spam, and duly deleted them, it failed to delete > >> several, which came through my inbox. > >> > >> Who in Paradise.net should I contact? > >> I personally think they need a good > >> kicking as well, but that's supposed to be barbaric and uncivilized. > >> > > Instead, why not put them at the mercy of a high powered sales creature to > > persuade them to install Mailwasher instead of the dumb system they have at > > the moment? ( X-fingers that the Mailwasher servers can stand the strain > Our own views on economics are first for examination, and politics for > something fit to last. > > cheers ~ r
