On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 22:07:18 +1300 Christopher D MAHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your intelligent sentiments there Nick. > ---- Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ============= > On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 21:48:20 +1300 > Christopher D MAHER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I know this might just start a flame, but there's no nice way of saying > > this. What the hell is everybody's problem with email in html format? > > Seriously! I mean if my emails are pink and fluffy so what. Do they take > > any longer to download? Perhaps on he slowest of dial up connections. Do > > they offend your delicate sensibilities? Perhaps... get over it! I mean > > if most of you are using Linux use KMail and kill the damn attachments. > > I've really held my tongue about this long enough. Who the hell cares if I > > use html format for email... NOT ME! But just in case you think I am a > > complete oaf I have reverted to the dark side and using web mail which is > > only PLAIN TEXT. So to all those who've had a whinge feel free to keep > > doing so, but I'll fell free to ignore you. > > > > No hard feelings, > > > > If you want to start an email list with different rules go for it. > Please do not top post, particularly when others in the thread have bottom posted.
