As I am a recent member I have to agree with David Kirk that your presentation was well researched and too long.
I feel that the presentation could have been condensed more and with more detailed technical information put on the CLUG web site. On 11/28/06, David Kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Volker, > Response has been rather low. I would appreciate any feedback, offlist > and/or from an anonymous email address if you prefer (no difference to > me). In particular I would be interested in hearing what to do better, > and for all my presentations this year, not just the last one. Thanks in > advance to all who can spare a bit of time on constructive criticism. I thought your presentations were great. They were thoroughly researched and well presented. You seemed to know the subject matter well. There was obviously a lot of preparation done. I did think that they went on a bit long, but I think that about most of our meetings. I often leave early. You were a little forceful with your opinions. You made it sound like if something didn't have a feature you required, that it was complete crap and anyone who decided to use it was somehow less of a man. That might be a slight exaggeration, but you could have just said for example that IPCop is more suited to a home LAN situation where pfsense is a better choice for a small office because ... Overall I found the presentations very informative and I would definitely go to any other presentations you decide to do. Thanks for putting in so much effort. -- Later David Kirk
-- David Merrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
