On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, John Carter wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Rik Tindall wrote:
> John's html
John never mentioned the licensing of his presentation material, which he'd
made for other use(s). Isn't it fair to leave him with the option of
whether it is 'free/open' or otherwise, rather than just assume..?
Let me be polite and politic in this particular instance and say
"Creative Commons License"
Normally I would use my bugroff license. (Ask google)
Dang! Email drops human intent again. I just realized that can be read
very much the wrong way.
Explicitly, I'm _not_ telling anybody to bugroff. It's just that I
once created another variant of OSS license that has achieved a small
measure of 'net notoriety called the "Bugroff license".
In this instance, posting this particular material, I was thinking I
better, ah, use one of the more conventional Open licenses.
John Carter Phone : (64)(3) 358 6639
Tait Electronics Fax : (64)(3) 359 4632
PO Box 1645 Christchurch Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
New Zealand
