On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, Kerry Mayes wrote: > On 18/03/07, Steve Holdoway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Don't worry about that. Can you ping 66.102.7.99 from the firewall? This > > is what www.google.co.nz resolved to when I tried this just now. > > Nope, 100% packet loss. > > > If you can, then it's a problem with dns, not routing. > > > > If not, can you post the output from route -n on the firewall ( you might > > have to put in /sbin/route -n ). > > re typing this so hopefully no typos: > > Kernel IP Routing table > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface > 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 > eth2 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 > eth1 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 > eth0 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 > eth3 0.0.0.0 10.0.0.138 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 > eth2 > > eth1 is orange, eth3 is blue both unused so far.
What sort of modem have you got? Is it set up to be a transparent bridge, i.e. does it pass the traffic straight through? If so I can't see your RED interface which should be configured to have the IP number you have been allocated by Orcon. here is what route on ny IPCop says :- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ # route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 10.0.0.0 * 255.255.255.240 U 0 0 0 eth2 192.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 203.97.115.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 default 203-97-115-1.ca 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1 eth0 local LAN - wire eth1 RED interface - goes to Telstra's cable modem. eth2 blue - wireless. Currently just an ad-hoc connection to my ThinkPad. Note the default route which uses my visible to the world IP number. I couldn't see one on your routes table. That's incorrect unless you have NAT activated in your modem/router box. -- CS
