On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 22:16:25 +1200
Steve Holdoway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:52:12 +1200
> Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Looks like the delay is in it.canterbury.ac.nz, either due to it being 
> > choked 
> > full and having an overly gummed up queue, or due to 
> > mx.node6503.gplhost.com 
> > not accepting the mail for a longish period.
> > 
> > However as my copy of the message was delivered staright away I think the 
> > dealy has probably been caused by the latter, ie the singapore server being 
> > slow to accept it.
> > 
> Looks like those who use the cheapest available shared hosting get what they 
> pay for... an overused and extremely basic postfix mail server - at least 
> it's on debian. And running apache 1 - 4 versions behind current at that!
> 
> http://sefu.tv ...  the future of Australian Hip-Hop. 
> 
> Any one know what these actually are? I'm not interested enough to google for 
> them.
> 
> 199/tcp open  smux
> 888/tcp open  accessbuilder
> 
> 
> Steve

It's the isp's name server as well!

Reply via email to