[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> apt-get whois install
bash: apt-get: command not found
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>

I rest my case, or complaint, or whatever i'm doing.


On Thursday 26 April 2007 17:57, Steve Holdoway wrote:
 On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:38:04 +1200
 Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 
 > I incorrectly assumed that something that basic would be installed by 
default, 
 > on a multi CD install!...
 Well, not really a default for a general purpose desktop, which is point and 
click oriented.
 > 
 > I have a wonderful set of network tools, in a nice tabbed display, NONE of 
 > which actually work as the back end programs were left out
 > Apt get isn't there because it is suse, so that means finding whois and 
 > installing it now involves firing up softwate that may or may not work, and 
 > so far has taken nearly an hour to get ready for me having a quick squiz 
 > for "whois".... If it ever lets me! 
 That sounds like something went wrong with the install ( or you've installed 
10.1! ). apt-get is certainly available for redhat versions... is it not for 
SuSE? not that I'd recommend it...
 > 
 > I've been spoilt, i've used debian till now, and as soon as i have spare 
 > bandwidth again, i shall return too!
 What do you want? I'll burn it for you. Personally, I recommend ubuntu feisty 
if you've got the resources to run it ( ok on my XP2400 athlon + 1GB mem ).
 > 
 > Suse has a long way to go before software installation is as direct as :
 > "apt-get whois install"
 Well nearly... right words, wrong order (: In this case, it's just that SuSE 
is different to either all rpm based distros as well as .deb based distros 
with it's 'wonderful' yast2 interface. It's no worse, although less 
rigorously tested due to the smaller number of users when compared to 
apt/yum. And, of course, it's far better for the MS converts who don't like 
typing. And, after SuSE 10.1, the current version is infinitely better. Just 
can't see why they decided to be different on the admin side... after all, 
most ''professional'' - is that enough quotes?? - users will be maintaining 
their machines through these awful third party front ends like plesk.
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 [snip]
 

Reply via email to