Also, have you tried holding the shift key down when trying to refresh a page 
in the browser?

On Thu, 10 May 2007 13:37:44 +1200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 10:41:33AM +1200, Matthew Whiting wrote:
> > i'm keen to solve this problem, regardless of whether I reinstall..
> 
> I'm grasping at straws really.  Someone else needs think of some ideas, I'm
> all out!
> 
> It does sound like your network is working.  However, someone else on the
> list might have some ideas as to whether you have an environment setting
> that is causing issues.
> 
> If you can ftp to an FQDN then it's hard to blame DNS or your IP network
> layout for the other issues.  Has this PC ever been at any stage on a LAN
> with a proxy (like Canty Uni)?  Have you checked the network settings in the
> control panel of your GUI?
> 
> Michael.
> 
> > 
> > my skills at network admin on a Mac are pretty limited too, so not sure
> > how to check on IP and DNS stuff. If I look under TCP/IP settings under
> > system preferences>network it is just select to 'Using DHCP' and doesn't
> > show any DNS settings.
> > 
> > yep, i can successfully ftp to ftp.nz.debian.org as anonymous. How would I
> > determine whether there is a proxying setting for gnome/kde that needs
> > changing?
> > 
> > just tried using apt-get and this hangs too..
> > 
> > cheers
> > Matt
> > 
> > > That's really interesting.  I think that there's something really odd
> > > happening here.  I am not so sure that a reinstall will fix this.  It's
> > > possible that there's some other subsystem getting in the way, but I'm
> > > bothered if I can think of what it might be.
> > >
> > > The address 10.1.1.1 seems to be a valid DNS server so I can't
> > > understand why it's not working for you.  I really recommend having a
> > > look at what your Mac thinks it's doing (IP and DNS wise) and go from
> > > there.
> > >
> > > Do you want to proceed debugging this or are you going to just
> > > reinstall?  If you can ping www.google.co.nz that makes me think that it
> > > should be working now.  Can you use a non web browser, like FTP to try
> > > out that?  If you can FTP to ftp.nz.debian.org as anonymous then the
> > > problem isn't so much in your DNS / IP setup and with your browser(s).
> > > Is it possible that there is a gnome / KDE environment setting on your
> > > box to do with proxying?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Michael.
> > >
> > > Matthew Whiting wrote:
> > >> but firefox and thunderbird still hang while trying to connect :(
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>> yep, the DNS Server is now set back to 10.1.1.1 despite me having
> > >>> previously set it to 192.168.1.1
> > >>>
> > >>> i can ping 10.1.1.1 and www.google.co.nz successfully.
> > >>>
> > >>> nslookup www.google.co.nz 10.1.1.1 gives:
> > >>>
> > >>> Server:  10.1.1.1
> > >>> Address: 10.1.1.1#53
> > >>>
> > >>> Non-authoritative answer:
> > >>> Name:  www.google.co.nz
> > >>> Address: 72.14.253.103
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks
> > >>> Matt
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 06:15:14PM +1200, Matthew Whiting wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Results of ifconfig eth0:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> eth0  Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:13:20:62:47:D4
> > >>>>> inet addr:192.168.1.102 Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
> > >>>>> inet6 addr: fe80::213:20ff:fe62:47d4/64 Scope:Link
> > >>>>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > >>>>> RX packets:38 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > >>>>> TX packets:70 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > >>>>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
> > >>>>> RX bytes:5320 (5.1KiB)  TX bytes:6399 (6.2 KiB)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> The IP address 192.168.1.102 is completely acceptable since it is part
> > >>>> of
> > >>>> the
> > >>>> network range of the LAN you appear to be in.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> and route gives:
> > >>>>> Kernel IP routing table
> > >>>>> Destination   Gateway     Genmask       Flags   Metric   Ref   Use
> > >>>>> Iface
> > >>>>> 192.168.1.0   *           255.255.255.0 U       0        0     0
> > >>>>> eth0
> > >>>>> default       192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0       UG      0        0     0
> > >>>>> eth0
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> This is OK too.  It just says that you have one network on ethernet 0
> > >>>> and
> > >>>> it
> > >>>> is the default path for all network traffic.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> cat /etc/resolv.conf:
> > >>>>> nameserver 10.1.1.1
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> Back to this again?  Had you manually changed this to 192.168.1.1?  If
> > >>>> so,
> > >>>> then when you went "ifup eth0" I suspect that the DHCP server issued
> > >>>> you
> > >>>> with this nameserver and dhcpcd overwrote your old /etc/resolv.conf
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Can you ping 10.1.1.1?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> traceroute:
> > >>>>> bash: traceroute: command not found
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> Gah!  You need the package "traceroute" (can you believe it).
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Try this and post the results:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> nslookup www.google.co.nz 10.1.1.1
> > >>>>
> > >>>> If nslookup isn't installed then try this:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> dig @10.1.1.1 www.google.co.nz
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Basically, either one of those commands will tell you whether 10.1.1.1
> > >>>> is
> > >>>> really a nameserver that you can reach.  If you don't get an IP for
> > >>>> www.google.co.nz, then try the same commands but with 192.168.1.1
> > >>>>
> > >>>> If 192.168.1.1 is able to resolve www.google.co.nz then you need to
> > >>>> console to your Linksys and try to work out why it is issuing the DNS
> > >>>> server 10.1.1.1 instead of
> > >>>> 192.168.1.1
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Please post the outputs anyway.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I wonder whether you have two DHCP servers on the LAN since I think
> > >>>> you
> > >>>> mentioned connecting a Linksys to another ADSL router.  I might be
> > >>>> mistaken,
> > >>>> but that could lead to some real confusion.  Anyway, if one host is
> > >>>> working
> > >>>> reliably and the other is not then it's harder to blame the network
> > >>>> itself
> > >>>> (but not an impossible scenario given the variability of OSs.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Good luck!
> > >>>> Michael.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> cheers
> > >>>>> Matt
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> I stand by the config I posted earlier.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Also, the manner of the problem you have reported could still be
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> explained
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> by misconfiguration in Firefox.  Is is possible that Firefox is
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> attempting
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> to contact a Proxy server?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> If you follow the instructions in my previous email then we can at
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> least
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> eliminate or prove some simple network problems.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>> Michael.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 05:35:17PM +1200, Matthew Whiting wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Before applying any of your suggestions after trying a few things
> > >>>>>>> my
> > >>>>>>> /etc/network/interfaces file now contains the following. How should
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>> I
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> proceed to edit this?
> > >>>>>>> -------------------
> > >>>>>>> auto lo
> > >>>>>>> iface lo inet loopback
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> mapping hotplug
> > >>>>>>> script grep
> > >>>>>>> map eth0
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> iface dsl-provider inet ppp
> > >>>>>>> provider dsl-provider
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> iface eth0 inet dhcp
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> auto eth0
> > >>>>>>> -------------------
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 12:47:07PM +1200, Nick Rout wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 9, 2007 12:38 pm, Matthew Whiting wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> connecting fine using this apple iBook. No such luck with my
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> desktop
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> pc..
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Its an xtra broadband connection and my machine is connected
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> physically
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> a port on a linksys wireless router which is connected to a
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> d-link
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> adsl
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> router. What would be appropriate diagnostic tools to use to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>> suss
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> out
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> what
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> is happening? Firefox tries to connect and times out. I'm not
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> familiar
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> enough with linux network admin tools to better determine the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> problem..
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> What is the output of
> > >>>>>>>>>>> ifconfig  -a
> > >>>>>>>>>>> route -n
> > >>>>>>>>>>> cat /etc/resolv.conf
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> ifconfig gives a bunch of details for eth0, lo and sit0. not
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>> sure
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> what
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> look for here?
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I was looking for the output in relation to eth0, which is the
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>> forst
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> ethernet device. Posting the output of the command would have
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>> been
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> fine.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> route -n gives:
> > >>>>>>>>>> Destination  Gateway      Genmask        Flags  Metric  Ref
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>> Use
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Iface
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> 192.168.1.0  0.0.0.0      255.255.255.0  U      0       0    0
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> eth0
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> 0.0.0.0      192.168.1.1  0.0.0.0        UG     0       0    0
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> eth0
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Weirdly there is no 127. route, but otherwise looks fine.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Can't remember ever seeing 127.0.0.1 in a "route -n".  Maybe
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>> you're
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> thinking of "route -nC" Nick.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Anyway, the absence of 127.0.0.0 is not important here.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> cat /etc/resolve.conf gives:
> > >>>>>>>>>> nameserver 10.1.1.1
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> clearly wrong, your dns server won't be 10.1.1.1.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Not *clearly* wrong since the Linksys maybe issuing another one of
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>> its
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> private IP interfaces as the DNS server address.  But yes,
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>> 192.168.1.1
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> is
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> likely to be a better bet. The PC can get to it because it's only
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>> got
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>> one
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> default route - via 192.168.1.1 as it happens!
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Try changing this to 192.168.1.1 (if the router provides dns
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> services)
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> or
> > >>>>>>>>> the ip address of your isp's dns server if it doesn't.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> If that doesn't work, try changing /etc/network/interfaces as
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>> such:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> --- Snip here
> > >>>>>>>> auto lo eth0
> > >>>>>>>> iface lo inet loopback
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> iface eth0 inet dhcp
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> mapping hotplug
> > >>>>>>>>    script grep
> > >>>>>>>>    map eth0
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> iface dsl-provider inet ppp
> > >>>>>>>>    provider dsl-provider
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> iface ppp0 inet ppp
> > >>>>>>>>    provider ppp0
> > >>>>>>>> --- Cut here
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Then do "ifdown eth0" and then "ifup eth0".
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Then do:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> host www.google.co.nz
> > >>>>>>>> arp -a
> > >>>>>>>> ifconfig eth0
> > >>>>>>>> route
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> By the way, do you have a link light on your network card and on
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>> your
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Linksys?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>>> Michael.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 

Reply via email to