On 7/3/07, Kerry Mayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A cynic would say that M$ put that in by design. On 03/07/07, Robert Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not so easy if the share is on a Windows Vista machine. > > Both Mac's and Linux boxes have trouble with Vista shares and "browsing" to > them.
Yes, Windows ejects messages to ports 139 and 445 as near to concurrently as possible. This confuses samba no end. The purported net-wisdom workaround is to put smb ports = 139 in the smb.conf file. Samba then listens on only port 139. I'd be very interested to know if this actually works. -- Sincerely etc. Christopher Sawtell
