I agree with the comments on Amarok, but for a large collection you really have to enable the SQL database option which is tricky for the novice. For me, the basic database that installs by default couldnt cope with my collection of around 2,000 files.
- David From: Kent Fredric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 13 March 2008 9:05 p.m. To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Dick Smiths $34 mp3 players & linux music sorters. Note 5. Any suggestions for music sorters / play sync packages for linux? Amarok is good for me. I have a large collection and it helps me run through things more analytically. My friends think I'm crazy for using statistics to help guide my play tastes, but I can't stand repeats. It has good support for tag editing inbuilt, and has handy inbuilt "burn all these tracks to CD ( via k3b ) ", and multiple 'transfer to removable media' features, but I can't attest to their quality, no mp3 player here. But IMO, amarok is definately worth a look, especially if you have a large collection ( its not really oriented at all to people whom have <100 mp3s ) Can play most things ( via xine most the time ) and supports tag editing en-masse, and can also play lastfm streams :D ¢¢ -- Kent ruby -e '[1, 2, 4, 7, 0, 9, 5, 8, 3, 10, 11, 6, 12, 13].each{|x| print "enNOSPicAMreil [EMAIL PROTECTED]"[(2*x)..(2*x+1)]}' Trustworthiness: Vendor reliability: Privacy: Child safety:
