On Monday 26 January 2009 15:09:21 Payne, Owen wrote:
>  Yes but on a machine that old, compiling a gentoo install even with a
> minimal package installation will take the best part of 2 or 3 days.

You didn't read the totallity of my posting!!!

> Safer bet is something like puppy or dsl or one of the others that
> abound.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Sawtell [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, 26 January 2009 2:55 pm
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Distro for a single use machine
>
> On Monday 26 January 2009 11:37:12 Payne, Owen wrote:
> > You could try a cutdown version or spin yourself a distro with only
> > the things that you need on it
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Linux on Back2Go [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Monday, 26 January 2009 11:36 am
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Distro for a single use machine
> >
> > Hi I was wondering if any recommendations for a Distro for a single
> > use machine.
> > I have an slimline IBM that was running 98 something on a network,
> > most bullet proof thing we ever had. I was wanting it to run GRAMPS
> > and maybe a very thin wordprocessor and nothing else but a keyboard,
> > mouse and monitor. So I can hand it around the family to do GRAMPS
> > things with it, Any suggestions, where to find Distro etc, I will be
>
> in Chch next few
>
> > days too if that helps, cheers Kevin   also on 0272497326 but text is
> > best.
>
> How much Disc and RAM have you got available?
>
> These days Linux needs a bit more RAM than was usual on 10 year old
> machines, but it will run very happily off an eight Gig disk.
>
>
> Consider Damn Small Linux, or Puppy Linux, or indeed spinning your own.
>
> If the latter, I'd think about starting from  one of the Gentoo stages.
> Before anybody jumps down my throat, remember that there are Gentoo
> binary
> packages for most of the system, and as he only wants two apps., they
> can be
> installed directly off a cd, or a binary repository.
>
> Consider AbiWord for the word processor.

-- 
With Sincerity,
Christopher Sawtell

Reply via email to