On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Roger Searle <[email protected]> wrote: > 4.0 was really should have been another beta, while it was nice eye candy it > was significantly lacking in configuration options compared to 3.5, plus was > frequently unstable. 4.1 could be considered a first release though the > update to 4.2 from what I read has finally got it to where 4.0 ought to have > been. All imho of course, however many share the view. Mean time I've gone > to the other side and quite enjoying gnome. > I'm sure google will tell you how to get to 4.2 and would be worth the > effort. >
I think you are confused about kde's version numbering. (fair enough, it is unusual). 4.0 essentially was RC, as was 3.0.
