On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:33 AM, dave lilley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Yes you are SO RIGHT Nick!
>
> Question I am wanting to view the HOLE documentary.
> I missed the start both Sat & Sunday (and it was by chance
> that i came across both boardcasts, I shall now check out to
> see if it's going to be on again and record it).
> THE subject Line does say Ot as in it's off topic!
>
> Explain what the difference is between me getting (copying
> myself)/asking for a copy or video taping? OR using anyother
> form of copy-left (i presume that's what this is called)
> act. Isn't both a form of copyright infringement? regardless
> of the person recording to view later and erasing the
> recording?

the difference arises from the terms of Section 84 of the Copyright Act.

84.  Recording for purposes of time shifting

      (1) A person (A) does not infringe copyright in a programme
included in a communication work, or in any work included in it, by
recording it, if—

            (a) A makes the recording solely for A’s personal use or
the personal use of a member of the household in which A lives or
both; and

            (b) A makes the recording solely for the purpose of
viewing or listening to the recording at a more convenient time; and

            (c) the recording is not made from an on-demand service; and

            (d) A has lawful access to the communication work at the
time of making the recording.

      (2) However, subsection (1) does not apply, and A does infringe
copyright in the communication work recorded and in any work included
in the communication work, if—

            (a) A retains the recording for any longer than is
reasonably necessary for viewing or listening to the recording at a
more convenient time; or

            (b) in the event that the person who views or listens to
the recording wishes to make a complaint to a complaint authority, A
retains the recording for any longer than is reasonably necessary to
prepare and despatch the complaint.

      (3) If a person infringes copyright under subsection (2), the
recording is treated as an infringing copy.

>
> We're all in violation of copyright in some form or other at
> some stage of our lives be it for only a short period of
> time.
>
> I was wanting to use a re-writable disc so i could watch it
> then reuse te Disk.
>

It sounds interesting, but ultimately too OT here IMHO.

Most OT posts at least relate in some way to computers or related technology.

Reply via email to