On Mon, 17 May 2010 13:03:35 you wrote: > On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 12:47 +1200, Christopher Sawtell wrote: > > On 17 May 2010 12:32, Solor Vox <[email protected]> wrote: > > Are you going to have a tux on the table? =) > > > > He and I have had a wee conversation. > > > > Initially. he stated that he is feeling very shy and frightened of > > being exposed to public view, yet again, in a alcolhol fuelled > > environment. > > > > I told him to stop be so darned silly. > > > > He has therefore, very reluctantly, agreed to do his duty as a mascot. > > > > So, Yes, Tux will be on view - initially anyway, but I have > > compromised with him, and he will be allowed to retire to my pocket as > > the evening progresses. > > That's pretty wimpy behaviour from an ex IBM stress-Tux...
*Mumbles something about Ubuntu*
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
