On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 20:28:27 +0800
begin "Chang[linuxism]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed forth:
> It seems that most-of-pom didn't include the string matches...
> And I didn't have linux journal from jan-2001 to jun-2001... :)
>
> > No. The most-of-pom target usually works flawlessly. The
> > patch-o-matic target can be _very_ broken depending on what you
> > picked. I have an LJ article in May and June (but May will cover POM)
> > on all this.
OK, then you do need patch-o-matic. But you have to be _very_ judicious
about what you include. Only say 'y' to the absolute necessities. I'm
using the string patch. Compiled with 2.4.17 easily. You must have
chosen something else that went bang.
Ciao,
David A. Bandel
--
Focus on the dream, not the competition.
-- Nemesis Racing Team motto
Internet (H323) phone: 206.28.187.30
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
