On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 05:42:17 +0800 "M.W.Chang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> She never made it, did she? Try installing any M$ product on a machine > with JUST the minimum requirements for that product. Is this what she > called a "promise"? credibility? credible evidence? well.... Ever try XP Pro on a 200mhz Pentium MMX, 128mb RAM, Rage XL graphics? It was still pretty fast, though KDE choked. Gnome was faster than XP, however. MS games won't run too well on that machine, but the OS runs about normal for an MS OS (and XP Pro crashes about five times a day on my Athlon system, as I must use the fool thing because of a few software issues and printing issues with Linux at the moment). What M$ product wouldn't install for you on what hardware? Bob Raymond > "David A. Bandel" wrote: > > And all round pegs shoved forcefully into square holes. Guess you > haven't > > noticed that Linux now covers so much ground, like i386 w/ 16Mb RAM (or > > less), to 64bit systems w/ 64Gb RAM, PowerPC, and more. > > > > Only M$ would consider trying to do it all from one code base. -- Specs: EPoX EP-8KTA3Pro, VIA KT133A AMD Athlon TBird 1.4ghz, 512mb PC133 SDRAM ATI Radeon 8500 IBM Deskstar 60GXP 40GB, Quantum FB 12.1GB SuSE Linux 7.3 Pro, XP Pro TB Santa Cruz Antec SX1240 case, 400 watt PS _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
