The RPM builds & installs just fine. Its really just a cosmetic thing, and i found it quite odd. Mostly just an FYI.
Susan Macchia wrote: > Ah crap, that s*ks. Can you take the tarfile and build it manually? A pain, > but it may work, meanwhile you can let RH know how much they blew it... > > Of course it may be that they relied on a 3rd party to create the rpm and they > just included it in their distro (they still should have tested it though). > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >>Ya, its not every SRPM that does that just some of them, and they're all >>directly from RH-7.3. >> >>Susan Macchia wrote: >> >>>Lonni, >>> >>>You may have already done this, but I would try building another src.rpm to >>>determine if the problem is with the rpm file (which I suspect), or with rpm >>>itself. Then, if the problem is the rpm file, whereever you got the src.rpm >>>(redhat?) is who should fix the problem. I bet its with the scripts >>>that are used to build the source from the rpm or some such. >>> >>>Good luck and HTH >>> >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> >>> >>>>That could very well be the problem. If so, its RedHat's fault, as all >>>>i've been doing is "rpm --rebuild <file.src.rpm>" and then attempting to >>>>install the resulting RPM. >>>> >>>>Susan Macchia wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Lonni, >>>>> >>>>>I've been writing a lot of k-shell scripts lately; to execute and assign >>>> > the > >>>>>value of an external "program", you would say, for example: >>>>> >>>>>foo=$(cat foobar) >>>>> >>>>>Which is why I am replying... >>>>> >>>>>the LIST=$(... looks like this - could be some kind of syntax error >>>> >>>>somewhere >>>> >>>> >>>>>or something. Just thought I'd throw this out as symptomatic of some >>>>>script problem? >>>>> >>>>>Don't know if this helps but... >>>>> >>>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>I'm in the process of rebuilding the RH-7.3 SRPMs, and then installing >>>>>>them. I'm starting to see some very very weird stuff, for failed >>>>>>dependencies: >>>>>> >>>>>>CXXFLAGS is needed by libsigc++-devel-1.0.3-5 >>>>>>LIST=$(shell is needed by libsigc++-devel-1.0.3-5 >>>>>> >>>>>>No, neither is a typo , that's exactly how they appeared. I'm using the >>>>>>exact same version of rpm that i've had for a few weeks (prior to the >>>>>>manual upgrade i'm doing). >>>>> > > > ===== > _____________________________ > Susan Macchia > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > _____________________________ > > - Running Linux - because life is too short for reboots... > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience > http://launch.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users > Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ L. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo: http://netllama.ipfox.com 1:00pm up 25 days, 19:54, 4 users, load average: 0.25, 0.25, 0.34 _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
