On Thursday 23 May 2002 11:38, dep wrote: > i propose that the resulting distribution be called "skippy," and i > for one will rush to put it on every machine here.
Rofl! Er, I think.................. > also, 2.4 had both lilo and grub, though the latter was the default, i > believe. i remember distinctly not liking the change, but being > satisfied that lilo was also provided. and i believe that the version > they provided actually worked. One point and I have seen chatter about it before BUT: What difference would an i386.rpm have to an i686 and would it be best to do them as i386? Suse rpms will install with Caldera, won't they ? Yep I know the road is going to be long but.................... -- Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'skippy' 18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161 Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
