Collins wrote: >A user on the xfce group pointed out this browser as an alternative to >galeon. Like galeon, it uses the mozilla/gecko engine, but it doesn't >require gnome. As a result it requires about 25% less memory >resources. It does provide good tabbed window support. It's a little >slower at page rendering than galeon, however. It also appears to be >a moving target, i.e. under heavy development. > >Enjoy, > > Interesting. Although i like galeon, skipstone appears to work, and work quite well. Since it uses the mozilla engine, I assume it handles frames and other features like mozilla (quite well). Have you found disfunctional features you'd expect to work?
_______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
