On Mon, 16 Sep 2002 18:58:12 -0500 "Richard R. Sivernell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would suggest that you not use C, but C++ as this is much better for the > reusability > of source code. C is old coding. C++ is going to give you the greatest > speed after ass > lang. Ummm... No flame war here (please!), but this is all (I think) a matter of coding style. I have seen lots of C++ code that was so bad I would hate to suggest it be reused. And some C code that has a decent API so that it can easily be reused. Not in the C++ sense, but in a pratical sense. I just had to comment. I will say no more. -- +============================+===============================+ | Roger Oberholtzer | E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | OPQ Systems AB | WWW: http://www.opq.se/ | | Erik Dahlbergsgatan 41-43 | Phone: Int + 46 8 314223 | | 115 32 Stockholm | Mobile: Int + 46 733 621657 | | Sweden | Fax: Int + 46 8 302602 | +============================+===============================+ _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
