On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Lee wrote: > > > Net Llama! wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Lee wrote: > > > >>Mozilla is critically flawed in that it has no search engine > > > > > > For starters, i'm not even sure you're right about this. But even if you > > are, why should a web browser have a search engine integrated into it? > > Does the word bloat mean anything to you? > > A search engine is what makes the difference between a true net browser > and a net router. I do other things than Linux; therefore, I need
No it doesn't. And your terminology has some very questionable meanings anyway. > information that may not be in http format such as the Hykosis Kings who > ruled Egypt at the time of the Exodus. Typing in Hykosis Kings into user > search or even Exodus yields can't find server if using mozilla default > page or if using netscape for home page it will default to Ask Jeeves > search engine under netscape. But, then it's a matter of what you use > your computer for. If you use the net to search a wide based information > group you need a search engine. If you only have one topic you'll ever > research you can always rely on www.linuxwhatever.com. Course you could > use Lynx and cut out all the bloat of mozilla. Then one man's bloat is > another's needful feature. Sorry, your argument above doesn't convince me of the need to have an embeded search engine in a web browser. Actually, i dont' even follow your argument. What is so difficult about pointing your browser to http://google.com ? -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
