On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:55:54 +0800 "m.w.chang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> compilation of gcc will produce a libstdc++. how does it differ from the > standalone ilbstdc++ package? > > also, I couldnt' compile my own libstdc++. there is no install.sh in the > tar-ball. > > Richard R. Sivernell wrote: > > Why would you think that? > > it is stl code for c++, is it not. If so you > > would need to replave the code itself. > > > > -- > Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux we trust. > / v \ > news://news.hkpcug.org /( _ )\ http://www.linux-sxs.org > ^ ^ > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> > http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Several different programs make their own libsdc++. I do not rebuild this on my system. I do however do use stlport, you can build it. cheers -- Rick Sivernell Dallas, Texas 75287 972 306-2296 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caldera Open Linux eWorkStation 3.1.1 Registered Linux User .~. / v \ /( _ )\ ^ ^ In Linux we trust! _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
