I'm guessing here, but perhaps there's a Windows server on the same subnet who's trying to be master browser, or at least confusing browsing somehow. Unless you've turned on WINS NMBD is purely broadcast, so I'd look at what else is on that subnet that would be causing strange responses from the clients. In case you haven't noticed, NetBIOS Browsing is evil. Even M$ wants to kill it.
On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 18:55, m.w.chang wrote: > hmm.. I don't think the Windwo$ clients can resolve samba name into IP > using regular DNS. guess I have to stay with nmbd. > > in that case, what do the errors mean? could I suppress the cry? > > >>root@server: samba.d> cat log.nmbd > >>[2002/10/23 14:49:07, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(794) > >> Netbios nameserver version 2.2.6 started. > >> Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1994-2002 > >>[2002/10/23 14:49:11, 0] > >>nmbd/nmbd_responserecordsdb.c:find_response_record(235) > >> find_response_record: response packet id 16931 received with no > >>matching record. > > -- > Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux we trust. > / v \ > news://news.hkpcug.org /( _ )\ http://www.linux-sxs.org > ^ ^ > http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
