-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 m.w.chang spewed electrons into the ether that resembled: > I noticed that it used a command "rpm-build" > it it from rpm-4.x only? >
yes. > could I safely replace it with "rpm" so that I could use it with rpm-3.x? yes. howerver, I suggest making rpm-build a symlink so that if you ever upgrade to 4.x it will properly overwrite the 'fake' binary > > and is it safe to just grab the source and upgrade my rpm 3.x to 4.x for > COL 3.1? safe? yes. easy? not really. and there's no real reason. use the latest 3.x version and you can use 3.x and 4.x based rpms - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://www.linux-sxs.org and http://jobs.linux-sxs.org printk("; corrupted filesystem mounted read/write - your computer will explode within 20 seconds ... but you wanted it so!\n"); 2.4.3 linux/fs/hpfs/super.c -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9vtc5SrrWWknCnMIRAjRlAJ4siH91im3h/FlUb9I13kGKAhy4BQCgvyoT CKRlmUbk7i/iPyw2j1kVyjE= =2RNK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
