On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Andrew Mathews wrote: > Keith Morse wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Andrew Mathews wrote: > > > > > >>FWIW- > >> I have a central syslog server running on Aurora Linux which is based > >>on RH 7.3. This machine is a Sun E250 formerly running Solaris 8. Aurora > >>is worth a look, it's worked flawlessly on my Ultra5 at home too. > >>(running X) > > > > > > > > What are your impressions so far comparing AuroraLinux to Solaris 8? I'm > > just in the process of buying a E250 from Ebay and am concerned about the > > binary license legal requirement of a Sun Binary license for this type of > > host. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > The only issue I had was during the install, as it didn't like a GUI > install. (locks hard) But it's a server, so X wasn't/isn't important on > that particular box. I'm not familiar with Sun's license on this, how is > it worded?
Gaa! Actually I don't know, though I've thrown out about 200 of the packages. Sigh, now I've got to find one and read it. _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
