Thank you. I am still a hobbyists.. . I can handle the consequence.
but it seems that since too much effort has been put into linux
securiyt, no one wanted to turn them off by a master-arm switch (as in a
jet fighter). Too bad... and that again will slow me down...
I prefer to switch on security settings piece by piece, not being
overwhelmed by the control panel on a 747 cockpit.
> DOS and Windows prior to NT/2000/SP have _NO_ security because they're
> built on what was essentially a hobbyists BDPL (Brain Damaged Program
> .... Security is more than anticipating cracking attempts, and
> includes protecting against accidental damage ranging from normal
> fumble-fingering to disk failures without proper verified backups.
--
Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux we trust.
/ v \
news://news.hkpcug.org /( _ )\ http://www.linux-sxs.org
^ ^
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
