I've been using it quite nicely for some time now. Caldera included it in their 2.4.13 kernel Addon package for COL311. I didn't realize that it wasn't a 2.4.13 module until one day I was scanning through the packages and checking files and such. Is there supposed to be a brick wall to run into?
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 20:44:57-0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 04:29:44PM -0800, Net Llama! wrote: > > Its not really new, its been around for over a year, but i think its > > only been recently merged into the kernel tree. I've used it a few > > times and didn't have any problems. The eepro100 has always worked > > well for me, but i've seen some oddball cases where it started > > spewing errors for no apparent reason, and got it resolved by using > > e100. > > > > On 11/23/02 16:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >Hi, list, > > > > > >I was just configuring the 2.4.20-pre3 kernel and noticed that > > >there's a new driver for the Intel EtherExpressPro/100 chipsets. It > > >is an alternative driver, written by Intel and denominated e100, to > > >Becker's original eepro100 driver. Has anyone here used it and run > > >into any brick walls? > > Thanks. I didn't realize it had been around for so long. The eepro100 > has always Just Worked (c) here, too. It remains to be seen if it does > me any good. Presumably, because the driver comes from Intel, it will > be better, whatever that means, than Don Becker's. We shall see. It > appears to be working right now. > > Kurt > -- > Conversation, n.: > A vocal competition in which the one who is catching his breath > is called the listener. > _______________________________________________ > Linux-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> > http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
msg08879/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
