On Thursday 28 November 2002 08:28 am, someone claiming to be David A. Bandel wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 07:40:19 -0500 > > begin Tim Wunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed forth: > > On Thursday 28 November 2002 07:27 am, someone claiming to be David A. > > > > Bandel wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > I have a Windoze network with a Samba server. > > > > Which version of Samba? > > V2.2 (what came w/ Caldera 3.11) >
2.2.0? Well, that's what I'm still running at work (compiled from source). I'm hoping to be able to update it to 2.2.7 over the weekend while no one's using it. But, that's certainly not a very current version and has some known problems (at least known to those who care... it' mostly works for us, except for occasional oplocks problems). <snip> > such as? how is it that there can be two separate workgroups with the > same name? something here is definitely amiss, but I have no clue what. > never saw two separate workgroups with the same name before. If I could > resolve the two workgroups issue, this problem would go away. > > <snip> Are they on separate subnets? Do the Windows PCs all have the same netmasks? Are the networks settings on the Wintendo boxes the same (other than IP address, of course)? What happens if you change the workgroup name on all the PC's to something else? (just thinking out loud...) HTH, Tim -- RedHat Psyche 8.0, stock kernel, Gnome 2.x, Xfree86 4.2.0 7:00am up 2 days, 18:08, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00 It's what you learn AFTER you know it all that counts _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
