On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 08:40:25 +0100 Roger Oberholtzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 07:25:12 -0800 > Ted Ozolins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ? > > > > A while back there was a post on the gentoo mail list that a fonts > > dir location was missing in X and had to be edited. I can not > > remember exactly > > > > what that was. A search of gentoo lists should get you that info. > > I'll look for it later and if I locate that post I'll forward it > > to you. I had to add the resolutions to my XF86Config after > > configuring X which I thought was rather odd. We must keep in mind > > that it is a release candidate so there is bound to be a couple of > > glitches along the way. > > What suprised me about that was what X itself did. Without > resolutions defined, I expected 640x480, not some very high > resolution. I wonder if my display would have survived after a bit > of time. > > I do like the Gentoo approach. But I will be glad when a new stable > release is available. I am suprised at how many things are masked. >
Even after the new stable release a lot of things will be effectively "masked." Gentoo has now moved to a stable vs. development philosophy, and packages will move into the stable designation more slowly. -- Collins Richey - Denver Area Redhat 7.3 system _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
