ReiserFS sucks less than ext3 :)
XFS is better than both.
On 12/28/02 08:59, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
Lived in Bellingham, OakHarbor and Everett for 15 years, miss the NW. Now I
am in Oklahoma. sigh., Anyway, what advantages does reisers have over ext3?
I read a post here about a reisers becoming corrupt, so I loaded up ext3. I
am realy configuring my drives blindly though.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Moffat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Libranet list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Linux Users list"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 10:52 AM
Subject: windy day in Seattle
Just a report on my day yesterday. We had gusts over 60mph here near
Seattle causing power to go out 5 times at my home, mostly for just a
few seconds, but enough each time to cause a reboot of my machine here
running libranet on Reiserfs using grub. Very excited to report NO
PROBLEMS. Quick reboot time, none of that fsck stuff, no loss that I can
find, everything functioning normally.
:-)
--
Ken Moffat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
p.s. "Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers" is highly recommended if you
liked the first one.
Agreed.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo: http://netllama.ipfox.com
9:25am up 13 days, 16:34, 2 users, load average: 0.17, 0.07, 0.01
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
