On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Bonez wrote: > No SMP box here..just a single old and slow but reliable Intel 266 processor.
Then why did you compile it for SMP? > Hmm I am learning. I never knew I had to copy the System.map over to the > /boot directory. I will do that now and test and see what happens. Its not a big deal, and as best as i can tell, the only problem is that harmless error. > > > I am sure there are plenty of issues to resolve in this small slice of > > > the boot message. > > > > Other than the fact that you failed to copy over the new System.map to > > /boot/System.map-2.4.20, it looks ok. That's hardly a show-stopper. > > > > I'm assuming that you haev an SMP box, since you built an SMP kernel. Is > > this with the XFS patch? > > Yes, I ran the XFS patch. I'll see if I can find the code that shows that > engaging. I know when I ran make menuconfig that XFS was finally listed under > filesystems as an option. Well, the easiest way to test is to format a filesystem as XFS, and mount it. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
