On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 01:06:20PM -0500, Bruce Marshall wrote: >On Wednesday 01 January 2003 13:34 pm, Collins wrote: .. >> Picture quality is rated excellent by consumer reports, but how much >> of a problem is the fact that there is no viewfinder, just the >> display? > >No problem that I've found. Might be a problem in real low-light >conditions where the display might not show enough.
The biggest problem I've found isn't low light, but bright light outdoors which made the display basically unreadable. I wanted a hood similar to that used on old plate film cameras. Bill -- INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ ``Anyone who thinks Microsoft never does anything truly innovative isn't paying attention to the part of the company that pushes the state of its art: Microsoft's legal department.'' --Ed Foster, InfoWorld Gripe Line columnist _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
