I think it takes both - the non programmer and the user type to write good docs.
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003 10:59:23 +0100 Roger Oberholtzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 6 Jan 2003 20:59:12 -0500 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Feigning erudition, Brett I. Holcomb wrote: > > % Hmm, I'll look at Mplayer then. I understand almost all of the stuff we > > use is done by people like us in our spare time but it seems the docs or > > at least a decent overview of what a package does and what you need is > > lacking on most things out there - even some of the "professional" ones!% > > % Docs are NOT optional! <G>. > > > > Agreed. But, programmers should not be the ones to write the docs. > > Very true. OTOH, our company decided to write docs for a bunch of software, > As a programmer, I would perfer that someone else document the stuff. But I > hate it when features go missing in the docs. Lots of work, and no one knows > it is even there... > > > -- > +����������������������������+�������������������������������+ > � Roger Oberholtzer � E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] � > � OPQ Systems AB � WWW: http://www.opq.se/ � > � Erik Dahlbergsgatan 41-43 � Phone: Int + 46 8 314223 � > � 115 34 Stockholm � Mobile: Int + 46 733 621657 � > � Sweden � Fax: Int + 46 8 302602 � > +����������������������������+�������������������������������+ _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
