Feigning erudition, Condon Thomas A KPWA wrote:
% Roger Oberholtzer <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed thusly on Tuesday, January 07,
% 2003 1:59 AM:
%
% > Very true. OTOH, our company decided to write docs for a bunch of
% > software, purposely not contacting the programmers. It made for nice
% > sci-fi reading about what the documenters thought the software 'should'
% > do. Admittedly, an extreme example.
% >
% > As a programmer, I would perfer that someone else document the stuff. But
% > I hate it when features go missing in the docs. Lots of work, and no one
% > knows it is even there...
%
% I once worked for a company that had a PR guy write the user document for a
% product and then asked me to write the software to make it do that! The
You're kidding, right? This reminds me of one definition of a programmer:
the one who makes the lies the salesman told come true. ;-)
% hardware had already been designed. It required implementation of a
% software UART, since the HW designer forgot one chip. Sadly, there are all
% kinds out there.
Boy, howdy. That would've been one dead PR guy...
Kurt
--
Baseball is a skilled game. It's America's game -- it, and high
taxes.
-- Will Rogers
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
