On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Myles Green wrote: > On Tue, 2003-01-14 at 09:50, Net Llama! wrote: > > Don't use RHAS, it blows chunks. I've had to use it occasionally at work, > > and its a huge pain, since its on such a slower release cycle than all of > > Redhat's other distros, the kernel is still at 2.4.9, and other stuff is > > ancient as well. > > Thanks for the heads-up... do you feel RH-8.0 Pro is ready for prime > time yet or is the usual advice (stay away from RH's x.0 releases) > applicable? I've been fairly impressed with SuSE 8.0 thus far (and > haven't heard much that would prompt me to upgrade it to 8.1) but SuSE > is not without it's weirdness either. > > decision time...
I've not tested 8.0 because i've heard a few too many nightmare stories. In my opinion, 7.3 (XFS) is ideal for a server environment. 8.0 is prolly ok for a desktop, but i wouldn't depend on it for stability. That and the fact that there's no simple way to get 8.0 installed on XFS right now. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
